Analysis of the Possible Effects of the Caste System

However, there are still countries that seem to lag behind because of their internal problems in regards to inequalities. India with regards to its present global profile is seen to be one of the rising economic powers in the world. In spite of its vast supply of labor especially the skilled workers, this country still remain a low-income one and poverty is still a big issue. This said problem is considered a result of its caste system. The Caste system divides people of India into four groups. This system decides for Indian people what they should do for living for their entire life. The Caste system did help the Indian society to be structured and organized. However, the system in the modern days was only an obstacle for India. It is considered as one of the most dehumanizing systems the world. The caste system is making a big gap between the rich and the poor. The extent of and trends in inequalities and poverty in India affects global trends because of its large population size and majority of its population fall under the poverty line. Due to globalization with the mass improvement of transportation and communication, nations are competing against other nations of the entire world. In a modern society, where time and resource are truly valued, the Caste system has held back India by wasting some incredibly talented individuals of lower caste. This system has made the poor suffer most. They were stripped of an opportunity to learn and be employed on bigger companies. This said situation has further led to the marginalization of the already marginalized people. With the growth of India’s gross national product, still the labor force in agriculture remains too high while those in the manufacturing sector are low. There is no doubt that a striking feature of India’s growth performance in the past years has been the growth of the services sector like IT, software and BPO industries. There is no doubt that India has employed millions of people for this industry but as impressive as the figure seems, it is too small if they are seen against the overall size of the country’s labor force. Employment is the service sector still lags behind. Additionally, employment is only concentrated in a few large cities and very few people from the rural and poor area find jobs in this sector because they lack the required skills. In other countries, the service sector tends to gain a larger share of employment. The rising of globalization has made people move from one place to another easily. Also education has also helped people disregard gender and social inequalities. If India would remain strict on recognizing the caste system, it will pose a threat for them in the future. The world is one, and how a nation deals with its immigrants is really important for the future of the nation. Many people now are intolerant to inequalities and discrimination. Therefore, India may be losing investors or possible capitalists just because of the system. The Caste system cannot make India a stable country anymore, since there is no spot in the system for immigrants to India. India should not lose what it was built for and based on. However, they should be really careful. The caste system may give birth to possible social unrest that may dismay or discourage other people to go to their country. This social blindness can be cured only when there is the realization that all people are created equal and have equal intrinsic value and worth. Analysis of the Possible Effects of the Caste System However, there are still countries that seem to lag behind because of their internal problems in regards to inequalities. India with regards to its present global profile is seen to be one of the rising economic powers in the world. In spite of its vast supply of labor especially the skilled workers, this country still remain a low-income one and poverty is still a big issue. This said problem is considered a result of its caste system. The Caste system divides people of India into four groups. This system decides for Indian people what they should do for living for their entire life. The Caste system did help the Indian society to be structured and organized. However, the system in the modern days was only an obstacle for India. It is considered as one of the most dehumanizing systems the world. The caste system is making a big gap between the rich and the poor. The extent of and trends in inequalities and poverty in India affects global trends because of its large population size and majority of its population fall under the poverty line. Due to globalization with the mass improvement of transportation and communication, nations are competing against other nations of the entire world. In a modern society, where time and resource are truly valued, the Caste system has held back India by wasting some incredibly talented individuals of lower caste. This system has made the poor suffer most. They were stripped of an opportunity to learn and be employed on bigger companies. This said situation has further led to the marginalization of the already marginalized people. With the growth of India’s gross national product, still the labor force in agriculture remains too high while those in the manufacturing sector are low. There is no doubt that a striking feature of India’s growth performance in the past years has been the growth of the services sector like IT, software and BPO industries. There is no doubt that India has employed millions of people for this industry but as impressive as the figure seems, it is too small if they are seen against the overall size of the country’s labor force. Employment is the service sector still lags behind. Additionally, employment is only concentrated in a few large cities and very few people from the rural and poor area find jobs in this sector because they lack the required skills. In other countries, the service sector tends to gain a larger share of employment. The rising of globalization has made people move from one place to another easily. Also education has also helped people disregard gender and social inequalities. If India would remain strict on recognizing the caste system, it will pose a threat for them in the future. The world is one, and how a nation deals with its immigrants is really important for the future of the nation. Many people now are intolerant to inequalities and discrimination. Therefore, India may be losing investors or possible capitalists just because of the system. The Caste system cannot make India a stable country anymore, since there is no spot in the system for immigrants to India. India should not lose what it was built for and based on. However, they should be really careful. The caste system may give birth to possible social unrest that may dismay or discourage other people to go to their country. This social blindness can be cured only when there is the realization that all people are created equal and have equal intrinsic value and worth.

Legal Issues in HR Management Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Legal Issues in HR Management - Essay Example â€Å"Unfortunately, the bottom line for most companies is not whether but rather when you’ll be faced with a legal issue involving an employee† (Weisbord et al, 1995). The main thing is to take a practical, precautionary approach so the company can lessen the possibility of being prosecuted. Faced with fixed financial plans as well as financial stress, businesses fail to identify the significance of guiding their managers. The majority of service claims involves a front-line manager’s behavior, either for the reason that the manager was unable to guide by example and busy in bad behavior, or the manager did not recognize how to deal with a workplace concern properly. Training the managers about essential employment law ideas and the way to be a successful manager is very significant. Another issue is that companies overlook to carry out periodic analyses of their human resources strategies and practices to guarantee that they are advanced and in accordance with the legal requirements. Reviewing the human resources and payroll functions within the business has never been more vital. For instance, the â€Å"Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division has become more aggressive in looking at whether exempt employees are properly classified and if overtime is being calculated correctly† (Getwood, 2007) . ... Payroll is an extremely synchronized and difficult task. It takes significant understanding as well as effort to give salaries in the approved manner and promptly. Yet workers look ahead to their paychecks to be done correctly and given promptly. If not, the business can have severe morale and legal setbacks. Set of laws having an effect on payroll incorporate the ‘Fair Labor Standards Act’ which controls overtime salary obligations, the IRS which controls income tax maintenance, and other national and state laws which legalize ‘state income tax withholding’, employees payment premiums, and unemployment indemnity. â€Å"Payroll record keeping is also critical for, among other reasons, the issuance of W2 forms at the end of the year† (Weisbord et al, 1995). Outsourcing payroll is an outstanding solution to the legal agreement concerns. The payroll services can give support in working with the law and, in most instances, fulfilling legal necessities. Fe deral OSHA standards have four main groups: general trade, building, marine, and cultivation. While a few standards are particular to only one group, others relate across industries. With the standards having similar conditions for every division of industry are those that deal with the access to medical and exposure account, personal defensive equipment, and communication about risk. Access to medicinal and exposure account requires the company to give the worker right to use to any medical report the company maintains relating to that worker, together with any report regarding the worker's contact to lethal substances. Personal defensive tools require companies to give workers with

Compare and contrast the policy implications of the theories of Essay

Compare and contrast the policy implications of the theories of justice in the works of John Rawls and Friedrich von Hayek. Illu - Essay Example 201). It is apparent that Rawls is not adequately certain in sorting out those distributive institutions that are in agreement with, or needed by, his principle. In reality, the theory is intentionally vague as Rawls, exercising his ‘method of avoidance’, tries to ‘avoid the question of the correctness of important social theories and rather to set out a conception of justice on the basis of which the question of private property vs. socialism in the means of production could be reasonably discussed’ (Wood & Woods 1991, 202). This essay will review the similarity and difference between the implications of Rawls’s and Hayek’s theory of justice on economic policy. Specifically, it will discuss the implication of Rawls’s theory of social justice on welfare economics, and the implication of Hayek’s spontaneous economic order on economic policy. Basically, the difference between Rawls and Hayek is that the former focuses on microeconom ics whereas the other on macroeconomics; however, both of them included in their discussion property-owning democracy and market socialism in a minimal fashion, while disregarding capitalism. The Implication of Rawls’s and Hayek’s Theory of Justice on Economic Policy The ideas of Rawls represent one thorough broad discussion of the issue to which others have felt forced to address. A comprehensive analysis of Rawls is relevant, not because he is ‘accurate’ whilst others are ‘inaccurate’, but because he methodically deals with these major concerns and his outcomes may be of particular relevance. In a recent literature review interconnecting ethics and economics, Hausman and McPherson (1973) firmly argue for the importance of ethics to economic policy. They refer to Rawls’s theory of justice as well. They cite a number of ethics systematisations, including Rawls, and claim â€Å"In our view, the parts of ethical theories we shall survey here may be of more interests to economists than are the whole systems† (Edgren 1995, 332). In applying the work of Rawls to discuss welfare economic policy economists have inclined to be careful. Others who mention Rawls frequently give an apparently rather more inclusive discussion. They will include the veil of ignorance, or the initial standpoint, for instance, but the emphasis is still quite on the difference theory and they still overlook much of the essence (Edgren 1995). Several applications of Rawls’s difference theory to economic policy are in opposition to the essence of Rawls’s notion. Primarily, it is entrenched in a thought system that is in some substantial essence utilitarian, whilst the system of Rawls is openly designed as a substitute for utilitarianism (Edgren 1995). Utilities, in welfare economics, are representation and not directly analogous, whilst in Rawls they are evidently the contrary (Bojer 2003). I think that some might claim that Ra wls is in error here, that he has created stronger premises than he requires, and that the remedial is incidentally. However, Rawls is struggling to expand the concept of primary goods and their importance to direct comparison. Moreover, the difference theory is related by Rawls to the anticipations of representative individuals in a theoretical scenario of imperfect unawareness, and is aimed to explain how social